similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔎Similar Site SearchFind websites like any domain 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Toplists Browse free →

Sites similar to forgooddesignlab.com

Forgooddesignlab alternatives & similar sites

For Good Design Lab — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Design →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
designers.org ↗	75 match shared topic	Designers.org - Original Architecture and Good Design from World's Best Architects and Designers	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sketch.com ↗	75 match shared topic	Sketch · Design, prototype, collaborate and handoff	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
good-design.org ↗	75 match shared topic	Good Design Australia \| Good Design Awards	en	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sketchapp.com ↗	75 match shared topic	Sketch · Design, prototype, collaborate and handoff	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kudos.nyc ↗	75 match shared topic	KUDOS Design Collaboratory™	en	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
maltcreative.com.au ↗	75 match shared topic	Studio Malt — A good energy design agency in Collingwood, Melbourne	Australia en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bohemiancoding.com ↗	75 match shared topic	Sketch · Design, prototype, collaborate and handoff	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
designforthecommongood.net ↗	75 match shared topic	Design for the Common Good (DCG) \| a coalition of purpose-driven networks	en	design WordPress Reaction Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
design-interviews.com ↗	65 match shared topic	Design Interviews	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
designerinterviews.com ↗	65 match shared topic	Designer Interviews - Interviews with World's Top Architects, Designers and Artists	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
design-legends.com ↗	65 match shared topic	Design Legends	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
magnificentdesigners.com ↗	65 match shared topic	Magnificent Designers - World's Greatest Designers	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
grandinterviews.com ↗	65 match shared topic	Grand Interviews - Design Excellence Interviews	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
visionaryreview.com ↗	65 match shared topic	VISIONARY REVIEWS - Contemporary Design & Culture	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
prodesigns.com ↗	65 match shared topic	Logo Design and Graphic Design services, a Branding Company - ProDesigns	en	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
red-dot.org ↗	65 match shared topic	Red Dot Design Award	en	design TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
designerrankings.com ↗	65 match shared topic	Designer Rankings	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
worlddesignrankings.com ↗	65 match shared topic	World Design Rankings - Latest Rankings	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.