similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to flurma.com

Flurma alternatives & similar sites

Flurma — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
inono.fr ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Système & Méthode — Tech, SEO & Systèmes	France fr	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lemag-numerique.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Le magazine numérique - Le magazine numérique pour les entreprises qui veulent rester à la page des innovations technologiques et logicielles	fr	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kiwipedia.fr ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	GitHub - alsacreations/kiwipedia: Base de connaissances techniques et bonnes pratiques internes à l'agence Alsacréations · GitHub	France fr	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nanxia.fr ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	NANXIA	France fr	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ia4developers.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Expertise ESN Craft I Conseil & Développement Logiciel \| Arolla	fr	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bugmarker.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Bugmarker - Feedback visuel et résolution de bugs	fr	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cthzone.net ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	CTH Zone	fr	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lucas-ortis.fr ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Lucas Ortis  Développeur iOS	France fr	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nawelle.fr ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	ARXONT — Turn infrastructure into evidence	France fr	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ingeniousthings.fr ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	foxtrackr developper portal – Make your own tracking solution	France fr	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kahlouche.fr ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Antoine Kahlouche	France fr	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lighttec.fr ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Optical Design Solutions \| Synopsys	France fr	software-and-applications Adobe Experience Manager	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jsaguet.fr ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	jsaguet (Julien Saguet) · GitHub	France fr	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
juliensatti.fr ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Julien Satti	France fr	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ldgr.fr ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Dastan21 · GitHub	France fr	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
micleo.fr ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Micleo - The next-generation SaaS / CRM Starter Kit	France fr	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mrsuricate.fr ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Mr Suricate - Outil de tests automatisés no code	France fr	software-and-applications WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nephria.fr ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Alys-Elica (Alys Elica) · GitHub	France fr	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.