similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to flextracking.app

Flextracking alternatives & similar sites

Built with Serverpod — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
mindcrackerinteractive.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Mindcracker Interactive – Technologies built with the future in mind	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mctx.ai ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	mctx — The best way to Build an MCP Server	United States~ en	web-development	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
wbpservices.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	WBP Services	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
janithsilva.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Janith Silva	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
digitaltechservices.store ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Home - Digital Tech Service	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
minecraftcms.net ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	MinecraftCMS - Premium Website Builder for Minecraft Servers	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
direct.dev ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Direct · Build onchain with 100x performance	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mimus-serve.org ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Mimus Serve - Mock http requests	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
weareredlight.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	RedLight — We build <code /> with transparency	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ryanss.co ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Ryans’ Server and Company – A coding portfolio	Colombia en	web-development WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
webcoreui.dev ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Astro Component Library with Svelte + React Support	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
webnext.dev ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Next.js Blog Example with Markdown	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bookwithjt.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	ProfitMax Accelerator Call with JT	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
devilishgoat.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Next.js Blog Example with Markdown	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thewebgo.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	The Web Go – Deploy prebuilt WordPress in 1 minute	en	web-development WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
webinfosearch.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Web Info Search - Search The Web With Us	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thesystemdesignbook.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	System Design with Laravel - Book by Martin Joo	en	web-development Gumroad	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dictate-button.io ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Dictate Button - Engage your users with voice input	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.