similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to flare.builders

Flare alternatives & similar sites

Flare Builders — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
springbuilders.dev ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Spring Builders	en	technology-and-computing Reaction Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
geekbuilders.net ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	GeekBuilders	en	technology-and-computing Squarespace Magento	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
stackpole.net ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Stackpole Builder's Canon	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kevqi.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Kevin Qi — Builder	en	technology-and-computing phpBB	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
statspro.biz ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Chart Dashboard Builder	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nadiaeldeib.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Nadia Eldeib - Founder & Builder	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nearbuilders.org ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	NEAR Builders — The builder's fastest path to market	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
beepiams.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Beep Iams \| Digital Builder	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kevinpo.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Kevin Po - Product Builder	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
a7ma.dev ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Ahmad Gerashi \| DevOps Engineer & Builder	en	technology-and-computing	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mdbuild.xyz ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	mdbuild	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aayushchopra.io ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Aayush Chopra — Builder & Writer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dearbuilders.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Dear Builders, \| Nickey Skarstad \| Substack	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mak.codes ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Tony Mak — SDET Engineer & Builder	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cthackathon.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	DevCreate BuildFest 1.0	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
marron.uno ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Joe — PM who builds	en	technology-and-computing	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
anej.dev ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	anej — developer, tinkerer, builder	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0xmemo.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	0xMemo — Software Architect & Blockchain Builder	PE~ en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.