similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to flapediciones.com

Flapediciones alternatives & similar sites

Flap Servicios Editoriales — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Publishing Industry →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
accensum.org ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	Accensum – Accênsum, servicios editoriales	es	publishing-industry WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
tregolam.com ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Editorial Tregolam \| Servicios editoriales y e-learning	es	publishing-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
icneditorial.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	ICN EDITORIAL	es	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
folioseditor.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Folios Editor \|	es	publishing-industry WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
estaescrito.com.ar ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Esta Escrito. Servicios editoriales y servicios en la web. Correccion de estilo	Argentina es	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
tresite.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Tresite- Tecnología y servicios digitales para el mundo editorial	es	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
editorialiuris.com.ar ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Editorial Iuris	Argentina es	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ultragestion.com.ar ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Ultra Gestión - Soluciones Editoriales	Argentina es	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
curtediciones.net ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Curt Ediciones – Editorial	es	publishing-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
astrea.com.ar ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Editorial Astrea	Argentina es	publishing-industry	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
garciaalonso.com.ar ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	EDITORIAL GARCÍA ALONSO	Argentina es	publishing-industry WordPress WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
deditorial.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Deditorial – Desarrollo Editorial	es	publishing-industry WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
altariaediciones.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Altaria Ediciones \| sello editorial profesional	es	publishing-industry Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
legadolatinovip.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Escribe tu libro \| Legado Latino Editorial	es	publishing-industry Weebly Square Online	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dework.com.ar ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Dework Editorial — Revistas digitales de zona norte	Argentina es	publishing-industry Spree Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
angrisanieditores.com.ar ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Angrisani Editores	Argentina es	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mybookeditorial.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Editorial MyBook - Diseño y edición de libros	es	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
pricoediciones.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Editorial Prico: Publica tus libros en Amazon \| Editorial PriCo	es	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.