similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to fkom.de

Fkom alternatives & similar sites

Corporate Design | Beratung | Marke | Web | Saarland | f:kom // feld kommunikation + design — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Design →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
satisfaktum.de ↗	100 match 2 shared topics	Corporate Design \| Beratung \| Marke \| Web \| Saarland \| f:kom // feld kommunikation + design	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lb-designs.de ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	Branding, Corporate Design & Webdesign	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
ruschdesign.de ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	HEIKE RUSCH - kommunikation + design \| ruschdesign	Germany de	design Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lara-kosdesign.de ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	UX/UI Design \| Webdesign \| Corporate Design \| Illustration	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kenoknipper.de ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Kommunikationsdesign & Motion Design Portfolio \| Keno Knipper	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 7
kunst-kreation.de ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Kunst und Kreation: Webdesign \| Druckdesign \| Malerei	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kunstundkreation.de ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Kunst und Kreation: Webdesign \| Druckdesign \| Malerei	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lamapark.de ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	sichtmodus kommunikationsdesign in leipzig	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sabinethernes.de ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Sabine Thernes \| Visuelle Kommunikation, Grafikdesign, München	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sanderrobert.de ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	robertsander – visuelle kommunikation	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
d-m-d.net ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	DMD – Daniel Markus Design – Grafik Designer \| Freelancer	de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
langedesign.de ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Martin Lange Design :: Büro für Druck- und Web-Design	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
eileengick.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Portfolio \| Eileen Gick \| Kommunikationsdesignerin	de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rollingbricks.de ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	3pix · Peter Hülsberg \| Kommunikationsdesigner [FH]	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rosendesign.de ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Kommunikations-Design ROSEN	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thomasmader.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Thomas Mader Design - Art Directon Digital, UX/UI Design	de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
killdesign.de ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Corporate Design \| Corporate Identity. Print & online für Industrie, Handel und Dienstleister	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
larissadesign.de ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Serotonin Design – Grafik- und Kommunikationsdesign aus Osnabrück	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.