similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to feedback-communication.com

Feedback Communication alternatives & similar sites

feedback communication GmbH — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Advertising Industry →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
konzetti.de ↗	76 match 2 shared topics	uc-communication	Germany de	advertising-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
salcomm.de ↗	76 match 2 shared topics	salomon communications	Germany de	advertising-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
carma-communications.com ↗	76 match 2 shared topics	Carma Communications	de	marketing-and-advertising	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lang-com.de ↗	74 match 2 shared topics	LANG communications	Germany de	advertising-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
comm-act.net ↗	73 match 2 shared topics	comm:act \| Where communication meets action.	de	advertising-industry WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
scheffer-communication.de ↗	73 match 2 shared topics	SCHEFFER Communication	Germany de	advertising-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
kinderfluestern.de ↗	73 match 2 shared topics	Applied Communications	Germany de	marketing-and-advertising	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kommunikationsberatung-stuttgart.de ↗	72 match 2 shared topics	WortFreunde Kommunikation GmbH	Germany de	marketing-and-advertising TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
maji-branding.com ↗	72 match 2 shared topics	Maji Brand Communication	de	advertising-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
lenk-communications.com ↗	72 match 2 shared topics	Lenk Communications – Kommunikationsagentur	de	advertising-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
le-jardin-extraordinaire.de ↗	72 match 2 shared topics	Le Jardin – Communication Extraordinaire	Germany de	advertising-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
vongoessel.com ↗	72 match 2 shared topics	Start - vongoessel.communication	de	advertising-industry WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
a-manual.com ↗	72 match 2 shared topics	A MANUAL GmbH \| Creative Communications	de	advertising-industry Wix	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cmd-holding.com ↗	71 match 2 shared topics	CX Agentur - Customer Experience Communication \| Chromedia	de	marketing-and-advertising WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
koepers-kc3.de ↗	71 match 2 shared topics	Köpers Corporate & Crisis Communications GmbH	Germany de	advertising-industry WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lab94.de ↗	71 match 2 shared topics	LAB.94 - people based communication	Germany de	advertising-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sanshine.de ↗	71 match 2 shared topics	Hello › SANSHINE Communications GmbH	Germany de	marketing-and-advertising TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kolibri-wuerzburg.de ↗	71 match 2 shared topics	Vogel Communications Group \| We empower you	Germany de	marketing-and-advertising WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.