similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to fdgivingback.fr

Fdgivingback alternatives & similar sites

FD GIVING BACK — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Non Profit Organizations →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
catholicvolunteering.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Présentation de l'association La Mie De Pain	fr	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
association-forward.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Le projet \| Association Forward	fr	non-profit-organizations Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
centre-francais-fondations.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	CFF – La fédération des fonds et fondations	fr	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
fondation-glnf.fr ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Fondation GLNF	France fr	non-profit-organizations Joomla	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mecenat66.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Accueil - Michel Cebrian Foundation - Fond de dotation associatif dans les Pyrénées-Orientales	fr	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
ieeefondationcanadienne.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Fondation canadienne de l'IEEE	fr	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
eoleactions.fr ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Eole Action \| Ensemble pour un avenir meilleur	France fr	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
fondation-hippocrene.fr ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Fondation Hippocrène	France fr	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
fondationhippocrene.fr ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Fondation Hippocrène	France fr	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
footencoeur.fr ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Association Foot En Cœur	France fr	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
fondationdesmonasteres.fr ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Fondation des Monastères - Accueil	France fr	non-profit-organizations Joomla	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
focom-orange.fr ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Focom-orange – Site de la fédération FO Com Orange	France fr	non-profit-organizations WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
fondationleoniechaptal.fr ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Fondation Léonie Chaptal	France fr	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
estran-tranchais.fr ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Accueil \| estran-tranchais	France fr	non-profit-organizations Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
acting-for-life.org ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Accueil - Acting for Life	fr	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
centreculturelamm.org ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	CCAMM	fr	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
decor-asso.fr ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Association DECOR	France fr	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ffmjs.fr ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	FFMJS - Accueil	France fr	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.