similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔎Similar Site SearchFind websites like any domain 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to fail.id.au

Id alternatives & similar sites

Trent "Lathiat" Lloyd - トレント — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
terra-intl.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Terra-International, Inc. - テラ・インターナショナル	ja	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
1tak.net ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	俺の一択｜比較サイトに疲れた、悩める貴方へ	ja	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
2hz.org ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	ぱじゃこむ（旧にへるつおるぐ）	ja	computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
maro.promo ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Maro Promotion （まろプロ） \| Raspberry Pi を使ってみよう！	ja	computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
marron-miscellaneous-notes.online ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	まろんの雑記ブログ \| 日常生活で役立つ知識技術	ja	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mazegohan.blog ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	まぜごはんぶろぐ – ゆるふわ工作室	ja	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
widedream.tokyo ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Hiromu Miyazaki - My Page \|	ja	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
embeddedmulticore.org ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	組込みマルチコアサミット2025 開催しました - Embedded Multicore Consortium	ja	computing Jimdo	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nksg.org ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	nksg.org – EVERYDAY CONCERNS	ja	computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
7oh.dev ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Accessible Tech Blog	ja	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alvine.org ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	ALVINE[.]org	ja	computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
keichi.dev ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Biography · Keichi Takahashi	ja	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kenpi-blo.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	KenPiのBlog \| KenPiのBlog	ja	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
temrer.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	てめさんだいありー。 \| 自分なりにいろいろ遊んでみた記録的な？	ja	computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
tetsufuku-blog.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	てつふくブログ	ja	computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
tips-blog.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	チップスblog \| ちょっとした情報、コツやテクニック	ja	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
remylog.com ↗	42 match 2 shared topics	レミィログのブログ	ja	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
bedroomcomputing.com ↗	42 match 2 shared topics	寝室コンピューティング	ja	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.