similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to examplelab.com.ar

Examplelab alternatives & similar sites

Examplelab — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Programming Languages →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
triplelog.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	TripleLog	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
amathews.io ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Alex Mathews	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pretzlav.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Alex Pretzlav	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
a-lex.dev ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	About \| Alex S.	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alukens.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Alexander Lukens	United States~ en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4dpiecharts.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	4D Pie Charts \| Scientific computing, data viz and general geekery, with examples in R and MATLAB.	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alexkondov.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Alex Kondov - Software Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
millerman.dev ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	amillerman (Alex Millerman) · GitHub	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
delabassee.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	David Delabassée – DevRel Java Platform Group @ Oracle Accessibility Activist	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
andrewbennett.com.au ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Andrew Bennett Blog \| Exploring life hacking	Australia en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
simpletechtalks.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	SimpleTechTalks - To make technologies simpler	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sillycodeproject.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Silly Code Projects - a place to put the code thoughts	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
idlavs.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Showcasing Life Experiences and Ongoing Projects \| IDLAVS	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
simpledotnet.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	SimpleDotNet.com - Powerful .NET Projects & Documentation	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ddmmyyyy.net ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	DDMMYYYY - Complete Guide to Date Formats Across Systems & Languages	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bryanlor.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Bryan Lor - A place to scribble down everything tech and code from Bryan Lor.	en	programming-languages WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dbjanke.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	D. B. Janke \| A place to think about systems, software, and the culture around them.	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
8thdaytesting.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	8thdaytesting – Development complete, on the 7th day they rested, on the 8th day we tested.	en	programming-languages Adobe Experience Manager	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.