Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI Report

Sites similar to englishcorrection.com

Englishcorrection alternatives & similar sites

English Editing Experts - Quality English editing and translations at affordable rates. — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Freelance Writing →

DomainMatchTitleCountry/LangCategoryAI filesContactAI-protection
gttranslations.ca 67 match
1 shared topics
GT Translations – Writing, Editing, Translation Canada en freelance-writingWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
karlaarmbruster.com 67 match
1 shared topics
Armbruster Editing – Editing services by an English professor en freelance-writingWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
jvdtranslations.com 66 match
1 shared topics
JvD Translations en freelance-writing robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
kelleychristensen.com 66 match
1 shared topics
Kelley Christensen – Expert plain language science and technical writing and editing en freelance-writingWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
cathylandrycomms.com 66 match
1 shared topics
Writing, editing, public relations and special projects - Cathy Landry Communications en freelance-writing robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
aegistrust.com.au 66 match
1 shared topics
Aegis Trust - Technical Writing and Editing Services Australia en freelance-writing robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
joseecouture.ca 66 match
1 shared topics
Josée Couture – Translation Services : English to French Canada en freelance-writingWordPressWooCommerce robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
german-english-translator.co.uk 66 match
1 shared topics
what makes a good translation United Kingdom en freelance-writing robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
cashandcompany.com 66 match
1 shared topics
Bonnie Snow: Expect the Best, Writing and Editing Services, and Take the High Road, Motivational Speaking. en freelance-writing robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
freelancemedicalwriting.co.uk 66 match
1 shared topics
Medical writing, copywriting, editing and proofreading at Elmcroft United Kingdom en freelance-writing robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
ichigopublishing.com 66 match
1 shared topics
Ichigo Publishing – Professional writing and editing portfolio en freelance-writingWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
karenklughwriting.com 66 match
1 shared topics
Karen Klugh Writing LLC | Strategic Communications and Message Development en freelance-writingWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
lefttowriteediting.com 66 match
1 shared topics
Left to Write Editing and Proofreading Services – Proofreading and Editing Services en freelance-writingWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
clearcontent.com.au 65 match
1 shared topics
ClearContent: Professional copywriting, editing and web content Australia en freelance-writingWordPressWooCommerce robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
lemieuxtranslations.com 65 match
1 shared topics
Lemieux Translations – Frédérique Lemieux • English > French Translator & Canadian French Specialist en freelance-writingWordPressWooCommerce robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
ayrescopyediting.com.au 65 match
1 shared topics
Copyediting, Copywriting and Proofreading | Ayres Copyediting Melbourne Australia en freelance-writing robotsllmsaihumans emailphone partial · 8
aaronredfern.com 65 match
1 shared topics
Editing and Proofreading | Aaron Redfern en freelance-writingWix robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
leonardtranslations.com 65 match
1 shared topics
Sarah Leonard Translations en freelance-writingWordPressWooCommerce robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.