similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to efficiency-rules.com

Efficiency Rules alternatives & similar sites

Dr. Michael Goeke im Web — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Communication →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
sprachdesign.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	sprachdesign Tomas M. Mielke	de	communication WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rhetoric-excellence.de ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	KOMPETENZEN - Rhetoric Excellence - Dr. Frank Lorenz	Germany de	communication WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
robertpeper.de ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Dr. Robert Peper \| Netzwerkanalyst und Kulturforscher	Germany de	communication WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
deep-throat.info ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	DEEP THROAT – Der Fachblog für mehr Dekonstruktionskompetenz im Kommunikationshandwerk	de	communication WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
khamseh.de ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Vereidigter Übersetzer مترجم رسمی زبان فارسی و دری در هامبورگ - Dipl. Ing. ( FH ) Farzin Khamseh / Persisch ( Farsi und Dari ) مهندس فرزین خمسه	Germany de	communication WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
elisabeth-noack.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	„Kommunikation ist kein Feinschliff. Sie ist Fundament – Für Unternehmen, die mit Klarheit führen, mit Haltung sichtbar werden und Wandel mit Sinn gestalten wollen." - elisabeth-noacks Webseite!	de	communication Jimdo	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
backgroundcheck.support ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Dialpad Meetings	de	communication	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bfk.one ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Barrierefreie Kommunikation e. V.	de	communication WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
classychat.online ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	ClassyChat - ClassyChat	de	communication WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
efendi.group ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Efendi — Behördenpost per WhatsApp & Telegram	de	communication	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
fl-intercoop.info ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Diplomatic Services	de	communication	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
2-m.biz ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Home	de	communication Joomla	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
2-t.info ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	2T – Gute Kommunikation.	de	communication WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
achtung.live ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Demo \| achtung.live	de	communication	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcrca.org ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	MCRCA Homepage	de	communication	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mediabeat.pro ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Mediabeat GmbH	de	communication WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
spanisch-dolmetschen.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Gesine Traub - Spanisch Dolmetscher	de	communication	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sprachgefuehl.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Sprachgefühl – What you say is what you get	de	communication	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.