similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to edgington.de

Edgington alternatives & similar sites

Gary Edgington — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Language Learning →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
tt-language-course.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Home - tt-language-course	de	language-learning WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sprachschulen.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	SRZ SprachReiseZentrale	de	language-learning	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sprachenzentrale.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	SprachenZentrale.de	de	language-learning WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
amilado.ch ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	amilado - Premium Language Schools	Switzerland de	language-learning	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
language-academy.net ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Language Academy Lippstadt	de	language-learning	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
drulrikewalter.de ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Dr. Walter Language Services	Germany de	language-learning WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dsp-languages.de ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	DSP Languages – DSP Languages	Germany de	language-learning WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
language-farm.net ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Language Farm – Kristina Vondran	de	language-learning	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
online-language-test.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Startseite - Online Language Test	de	language-learning WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
ferrari-languages.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Ferrari Languages – Language Learning	de	language-learning WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ralfen.de ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	ralfen.de – Ausgeralfte Wort-Namensvariationen	Germany de	language-learning WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
drlukes.de ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Language Service Dr. Lukes GmbH - Ihre Sprachschule Stuttgart	Germany de	language-learning WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
imperiallanguageclub.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Imperial Language Club – Premium German Coaching	de	language-learning WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
prisma-ev.de ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Prisma e.V. Sprachenschule / Language Institute - Deutsch	Germany de	language-learning	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
queergesprochen.de ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	QUEER_gesprochen?! – German Language Courses for LGBTQI*	Germany de	language-learning WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
reading-institute.de ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Reading Institute Deutschland \| Taking you beyond language	Germany de	language-learning WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
languageanimation.org ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Abenteuer Sprachanimation – Sprachanimation language animation animation linguistique animacją językową	de	language-learning WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
edwinsain.de ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Edwin Sain - English language training and translation services	Germany de	language-learning	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.