similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to eadh.org

Eadh alternatives & similar sites

EADH - The European Association for Digital Humanities | — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Education →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
ctdh.io ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Connecticut Digital Humanities	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kapsonline.org ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Kentucky Association for Psychology in the Schools	en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
associationofblacksociologists.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Home - The Association of Black Sociologists	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kathyanderson.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Online Portfolio \| Digital humanities issues, tools, and resources	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
katiekania.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Online Portfolio – Digital humanities issues, tools, and resources	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mdaba.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Home \| Maryland Association for Behavior Analysis	en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ctreadingresearch.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	CARR: Connecticut Association for Reading Research	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
humanitiesdata.ca ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	The Humanities Data Lab – A Digital Humanities Lab in uOttawa's Faculty of Arts	Canada en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dukies.co.uk ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Home \| The Dukies' Association	United Kingdom en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aepl.org.au ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Association for Educational Projects Limited	Australia en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cegeassociation.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	CEGE Association	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cbgfoundation.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Cbg Foundation for Humanity & Education	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
skepticalhumanities.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Skeptical Humanities \| Learning is Cool	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alumniassociationnetwork.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Alumni Association Network	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aau.edu ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Association of American Universities (AAU)	en	education Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aawp.org.au ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Australasian Association of Writing Programs	Australia en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
foyscalf.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	FOY SCALF – at the nexus of research, information science, digital humanities, big data, and public scholarship	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
karenniamerican.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Karenni-American Association – Center for Karenni-Americans	United States~ en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.