similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to e-nef.com

E Nef alternatives & similar sites

E-Nef: Perl / Linux / Roman Art — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Programming Languages →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
romanboba.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Roman Boba	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
romainardiet.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Home \| romain ardiet	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bobbylikeslinux.net ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	bobbylikeslinux	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nextdoorhacker.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	NextDoorHacker	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ttarsi.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Tyler Tarsi	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rodrigodeleon.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Rodrigo de León - Backend Software Engineer	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csharp-station.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Tutorials, Links and Articles About C# \| C# Station	en	programming-languages WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
qb64.dev ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	QB64.com \| QB64 is a modern extended BASIC programming language that retains QBasic/QuickBASIC 4.5 compatibility and compiles native binaries for Windows, Linux, and macOS.	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
qb64.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	QB64.com \| QB64 is a modern extended BASIC programming language that retains QBasic/QuickBASIC 4.5 compatibility and compiles native binaries for Windows, Linux, and macOS.	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jarthur.dev ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Jerry Arthur's Personal Portfolio	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
guildoftechnomancers.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Guild Hall \| Guild of Technomancers	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
habkost.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Eduardo Habkost \| Software Developer. C; QEMU; KVM; virtualization; Linux; Python; etc.	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
themakeinfo.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	MakeInfo - Android Tutorial,Apps,Games,Linux,Python	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
10print.org ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	10 PRINT CHR$(205.5+RND(1)); : GOTO 10	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
blog-frankfan.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Frank’s Personal Blog	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
boxloan.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Perlx	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pythonformaya.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Python Course for Maya Artists	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
braincells.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Consolidated Braincells Inc.	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.