similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to dwherold.de

Dwherold alternatives & similar sites

German Science Herald — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Science →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
science-on-stage.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Start \| Science On Stage	Germany de	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nightofscience.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Night of Science – 12.06.2026	Germany de	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
oktogon-futurelab.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Future Lab – SCIENCE meets CULTURE	de	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cs-communication.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Startseite - CS Science Communication GmbH	de	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
experimenta.science ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	experimenta \| Deutschlands größtes Science Center	de	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
schweizerbart.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Home — Schweizerbart science publishers	Germany de	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 6
discover-illustrations.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	disCover – We visualize science	de	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
scienceblogs.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	ScienceBlogs auf Deutsch	Germany de	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
drstephenwagner.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Dr. Stephen Wagner – Science Pitch, Präsentationstraining & Keynote Speaking	de	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
textconsulting.net ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	SciFi – Nemesis of Junk and Pseudo-Science	de	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	full · 19
pangaea.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Data Publisher for Earth & Environmental Science	Germany de	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sciencegarden.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	sciencegarden: Magazin für junge Forschung im Archiv	Germany de	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
odeelab.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Optische Diagnosemethoden und Erneuerbare Energien - Laboratory for optical diagnostics at Darmstadt University of Applied Sciences.	de	science WordPress WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
wissenschaft-im-dialog.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Wissenschaft im Dialog	Germany de	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
tilmangrune.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	start - pr. dr. tilman grune	de	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
tab-beim-bundestag.de ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	TAB - Büro für Technikfolgen-Abschätzung beim Deutschen Bundestag (TAB)	Germany de	science	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
tfabula.me ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	TFabula – passion 4 performance	de	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nipsu.de ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	DG-Transkription - wissenschaftlicher Schreibservice	Germany de	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.