similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔎Similar Site SearchFind websites like any domain 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to dvdkly.com

Dvdkly alternatives & similar sites

David Kelly Profile — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Programming Languages →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
moonylabs.org ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Moony2HP Profile	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kevgathuku.dev ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Kevin Gathuku	en	programming-languages Gatsby	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cttm.io ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Code to the Moon	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abenezer.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Abenezer Belachew / Software Developer	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 1
ddiez.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	david diez	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
doingitwrong.dev ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Doing It Wrong – learn in public	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
benforshey.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Doing It Wrong – learn in public	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aesthetecoding.io ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Aesthete coding, Easy to code, hard to master	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
benatkin.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Benjamin Atkin – web developer	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
denisse.dev ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	andrea denisse	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
simp7.dev ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Simple & Clear	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
modperlcookbook.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	The mod_perl Developer's Cookbook - Learn all about mod_perl with this new book.	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aaccurso.me ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Alan Accurso	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
khanakat.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Fernando Calmet	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
devdoc.net ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Developer's Documentation Collections	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adamnengland.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Adam N England – Professional Software Engineer, Amateur Human Being	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
frank-germano-jr.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Frank Germano, Jr. – Thoughts on Software	en	programming-languages WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
berchant.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Berchant Masheka.	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.