similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to drpaulwallace.com

Drpaulwallace alternatives & similar sites

Paul A. Wallace – Experimental Volcanologist & Petrologist — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Geology →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
volcannick.com ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	Volcanology and Igneous Petrology Group @ W&L	en	geology WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
volcpeg.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Volcanic Petrology and Geochemistry – The volcanic research group at the University of Barcerlona	en	geology WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
volcanodeformation.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Volcano Deformation	en	geology	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
donpenman.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Dr. Donald E. Penman – Assistant Professor, Geosciences Department, Utah State University	en	geology WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gelogia.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Gelogia – Geology, Science & Educational Content Platform	en	geology WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
volcano-waka-lab.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Volcano Waka Lab	en	science Squarespace	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
esconi.org ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Earth Science Club of Northern Illinois – Promoting Interest in the earth sciences including geology, paleontology, mineralogy, and archaeology, since 1949	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cslmiami.info ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Comparative Sedimentology Laboratory	en	geology	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
voluna.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Voluna - Neutron technology that is revolutionizing resource exploration	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
atmos-meas-tech.net ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	AMT - Journal volumes	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
auswot.org ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Australian Surface Water Ocean Topography working group	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
crystalalmanac.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Crystal Almanac - Encyclopedia of Crystals, Minerals & Stones	en	geology	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
annalsofgeophysics.eu ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Annals of Geophysics	European Union en	geology	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
paleoenvironment.eu ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Paleoenvironment – Guillaume Dupont-Nivet	European Union en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
barringercrater.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	The Barringer Crater Company	United States~ en	science Squarespace Magento	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
electrodynamic-geology.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	electrodynamic-geology.com — Geology Through Weber Electrodynamics	en	geology	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
antarcticglaciers.org ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Antarctic Glaciers	en	geology WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
neilrbennett.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	neil bennett – Science // Photography // Flotsam	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.