similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to draussenzeit.com

Draussenzeit alternatives & similar sites

Redaktionsbüro | Draussenzeit — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Freelance Writing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
redbuero.net ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	redaktionsbüro joachim bley \| konzept und content	de	freelance-writing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
online-redaktion.net ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Mirjam Peitz M.A. \| Online-Redaktion \| Lektorat \|	de	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ilonakoglin.net ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Startseite - WHOOPEE CONNECTIONS - I. Koglin & M. Rohde GbR	de	content-production WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
katharinaleuck.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	KATHARINA LEUCK - Journalismus – Blogging – Übersetzen	de	freelance-writing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
tz-media-beratung.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Thomas Zwicker \| Journalist	de	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
nicole-hey.de ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Inhalt und Struktur	Germany de	freelance-writing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
derstoryblogger.at ↗	40 match 2 shared topics	Gregor Schinko - der Storyblogger	Austria de	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
redaktion-szs.com ↗	38 match 1 shared topics	Redaktion SZS	de	freelance-writing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nicolaberger.de ↗	36 match 1 shared topics	Nicola Berger - Text und Redaktion	Germany de	freelance-writing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nipp-nau.de ↗	35 match 1 shared topics	nipp-nau.de – Textbüro nipp&nau – Lektorat, Redaktion, Text	Germany de	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
redaktion-lux.com ↗	34 match 1 shared topics	Redaktion - Michael Lux - kommunikativ, kreativ, stilsicher	de	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nikolaus-wolters.de ↗	34 match 1 shared topics	Lektorat & Textredaktion – Nikolaus Wolters \| Lektorat \| Textredaktion \| Korrektur	Germany de	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
shikelin.com ↗	34 match 1 shared topics	content - communication - culture - Redaktionelle Dienstleistungen aus einer Hand	de	freelance-writing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
reineckecommunications.com ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	Reineke Communications \| Clever Content	de	content-production	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
reinekecommunications.com ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	Reineke Communications \| Clever Content	de	content-production	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
reinickecommunications.com ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	Reineke Communications \| Clever Content	de	content-production	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
reinikecommunications.com ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	Reineke Communications \| Clever Content	de	content-production	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
petra-uhe.com ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	Petra Uhe - Corporate Publishing - Journalistin und PR-Redakteurin	de	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.