similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to dorisbrenner.de

Dorisbrenner alternatives & similar sites

Doris Brenner - Personalentwicklung - Training - Coaching — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Human Resources →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
fit4newwork.ch ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	Coaching & Personalentwicklung & Resilienz Workshops fit4newwork GmbH Bern	Switzerland de	human-resources Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
apm3.de ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Weiterbildung & Recruiting mit apm³ gestalten	Germany de	human-resources WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
asgrewenig.de ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Arbeitssicherheit in Eging am See – ASG ArbeitsSicherheitGrewenig	Germany de	human-resources	robots llmsaihumans	email phone	none
cts-fachseminare.de ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Startseite	Germany de	human-resources Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
agiletothepeople.org ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Agile To The People	de	human-resources WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dinx.org ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Home	de	human-resources TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
arbeitsschutzrotman.de ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	arbeitsschutz rotman	Germany de	human-resources WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
arensundarens.de ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Startseite	Germany de	human-resources Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
arbeitsschutz-oberst.de ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Home	Germany de	human-resources	robots llmsaihumans	email phone	none
andreasjungblut.de ↗	42 match 1 shared topics	Andreas Jungblut - Personalentwicklung - Home	Germany de	human-resources	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
curanda.org ↗	41 match 2 shared topics	Systemische Beratung Neukölln \| Resilienz & Diversität \| Curanda	de	management-consulting-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mitzinger-arbeitssicherheit.com ↗	40 match 2 shared topics	Home - Mitzinger Partner für Arbeitssicherheit	de	management-consulting-industry Jimdo	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cspersonalentwicklung.de ↗	40 match 1 shared topics	Willkommen - CS Personalentwicklung	Germany de	human-resources WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
as-freiberg.de ↗	40 match 2 shared topics	ASF GmbH - Arbeitsschutz und Brandschutz	Germany de	management-consulting-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
amammersee.de ↗	39 match 1 shared topics	Personalentwicklung-Ammersee: Home	Germany de	human-resources	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
anke-lange.de ↗	39 match 1 shared topics	Anke Lange \| Personalentwicklung nah am Menschen	Germany de	human-resources WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
bedema.ch ↗	38 match 1 shared topics	Personalentwicklung & therapeutische Arbeit - bedema	Switzerland de	human-resources Contao	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
andrea-karwane.de ↗	38 match 1 shared topics	Andrea Karwane - Unternehmens- und Personalentwicklung	Germany de	human-resources	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.