Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI Report

Sites similar to dkpg.com

Dkpg alternatives & similar sites

DK Perunding – Civil • Structural • Geotechnical Consulting Engineers — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Civil Engineering Industry →

DomainMatchTitleCountry/LangCategoryAI filesContactAI-protection
mceconsultants.com 73 match
1 shared topics
MCE Consultants – Consulting Civil & Geotechnical Engineers en civil-engineering-industryWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
fmgengineering.com 73 match
1 shared topics
FMG Engineering | Consulting Civil and Geotechnical Engineers United States~ en civil-engineering-industryDrupal robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
davidsonwalsh.co.uk 72 match
1 shared topics
Davidson Walsh – Consulting Structural and Civil Engineers United Kingdom en civil-engineering-industryWordPressWooCommerce robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
faraj-consulting.co.uk 72 match
1 shared topics
Faraj Consulting LTD – Consulting Structural and Civil Engineers United Kingdom en civil-engineering-industryWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
k2d-eng.com 72 match
1 shared topics
K2 Design | Consulting Structural & Civil Engineers en civil-engineering-industryWordPressWooCommerce robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
trisconsulting.com 72 match
1 shared topics
TRIS Consulting Engineers – Structural & Civil Engineers | Melbourne en civil-engineering-industryWordPressWooCommerce robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
aussiebuildings.com.au 72 match
1 shared topics
Aussie Building Specialists and GEOTECH – Civil, Geotechnical & Structural Engineers Australia en civil-engineering-industryWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
cengrs.org 72 match
1 shared topics
Cengrs | Geotechnical Engineering Consulting en civil-engineering-industry robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
cengrs.net 72 match
1 shared topics
Cengrs | Geotechnical Engineering Consulting en civil-engineering-industry robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
cengers.org 72 match
1 shared topics
Cengrs | Geotechnical Engineering Consulting en civil-engineering-industry robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
bricsengineers.com 72 match
1 shared topics
BRICS Consulting Engineers | structural engineer en civil-engineering-industryWix robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
acses.com.au 71 match
1 shared topics
ACSES Engineers | Structural, Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Sydney Australia en civil-engineering-industry robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
cbcconsult.com.au 71 match
1 shared topics
CBC Consulting Pty Ltd Structural Engineers Australia en civil-engineering-industryWix robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
gilligan.co.uk 71 match
1 shared topics
Gilligan | Structural Engineers – Consulting Civil and Structural Engineers United Kingdom en civil-engineering-industryWordPressWooCommerce robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
clivesteele.com.au 71 match
1 shared topics
Clive Steele Partners - Consulting Structural & Civil Engineers Australia en civil-engineering-industryWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
trpconsult.com 71 match
1 shared topics
TRP Consulting Ltd | Civil & Structural Engineering | Manchester en civil-engineering-industryWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
civiltest.com.au 71 match
1 shared topics
Geotechnical Engineering | Soil Testing | Consulting | Civiltest Australia en civil-engineering-industry robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
sigmaengineeringsolutions.com 71 match
1 shared topics
Sigma Engineering Solutions: Consulting Civil & Structural Engineers en civil-engineering-industry robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.