similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to digitalisaatio.net

Digitalisaatio alternatives & similar sites

Digitaalinen kaksonen — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Internet Of Things →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
impactum.fi ↗	39 match 1 shared topics	Liiketoiminnan digitaalinen kehitys - Impactum	Finland fi	artificial-intelligence WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
digita.fi ↗	38 match 1 shared topics	Huomisen arvoinen digitaalinen toimintaympäristö - Digita	Finland fi	internet-of-things WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
digitv.fi ↗	38 match 1 shared topics	Huomisen arvoinen digitaalinen toimintaympäristö - Digita	Finland fi	internet-of-things WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
digitamahdollistaa.fi ↗	38 match 1 shared topics	Huomisen arvoinen digitaalinen toimintaympäristö - Digita	Finland fi	internet-of-things WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
digistifiksu.fi ↗	35 match 1 shared topics	Digisti fiksu – Fiksut digitaaliset palvelut	Finland fi	artificial-intelligence WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hartikaari.fi ↗	34 match 1 shared topics	Hartikaari Oy \| Tekoäly & Digitaaliset ratkaisut 2026	Finland fi	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
iotnetfinland.fi ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	IoTNet Finland Oy on kotimainen IoT-operaattori	Finland fi	internet-of-things Concrete5	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
heiniset.fi ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	Henrik Heininen — Portfolio	Finland fi	internet-of-things	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jarjestodigi.fi ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	Järjestödigi-kartoitus	Finland fi	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jussimakinen.fi ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	Jussi Mäkinen	Finland fi	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jyrimustonen.fi ↗	31 match 1 shared topics	Tekoälyratkaisut yrityksille \| AI-konsultointi ja mentorointi \| Jyri Mustonen	Finland fi	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
easylog.fi ↗	31 match 1 shared topics	Etusivu - Easylog	Finland fi	artificial-intelligence WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
iamai.fi ↗	31 match 1 shared topics	IAMAi — Datasta tekoälyyn	Finland fi	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cozify.fi ↗	30 match 1 shared topics	Cozify – IoT-alusta uuden sukupolven palveluillesi	Finland fi	internet-of-things Shopify X-Cart	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
induo.fi ↗	30 match 1 shared topics	Kraftfull och säker hårdvara för lösningar som skall hålla i många år.	Finland fi	internet-of-things WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nyberg.ai ↗	30 match 1 shared topics	Nyberg Partners	fi	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
edgeai.fi ↗	30 match 1 shared topics	EdgeAI - Dokumentaatio	Finland fi	artificial-intelligence	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
empirica.fi ↗	30 match 1 shared topics	Skaalaa liiketoimintaasi ilman rekrytointeja \| Empirica Finland	Finland fi	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.