similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to defort.de

Defort alternatives & similar sites

defortdesign, Wolfgang Defort - Web-Design, Print & Fotografie, Bassum - www-defort-de — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Web Design And Html →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
amir.de ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	screendesign - webdesign, fotos, film \| amir.de	Germany de	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
arphotography.de ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Alexander Reimer - Fotografie, Web- und Grafikdesign	Germany de	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
andrepetrow.de ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Webdesign Fotografie Schleswig Flensburg - EINE GUTE SEITE	Germany de	web-design-and-html Jimdo	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
anna-nohlen.de ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Photographie und Webdesign Anna Nohlen	Germany de	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
blackfrog.ch ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	blackfrog webdesign & photography	Switzerland de	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
andreasachau.de ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Andrea Sachau \| Webentwicklerin und Kommunikationsdesignerin	Germany de	web-design-and-html WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mitze.org ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Mitze Webdesign und Photographie - MWP	de	web-design-and-html WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
artdelite.de ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Artdelite \| Kunst & Photography	Germany de	web-design-and-html WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
anvalin.de ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Home – anvalin.net	Germany de	web-design-and-html WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
danakirchner.de ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	danakirchner – Eine weitere WordPress-Website	Germany de	web-design-and-html WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
anton-zollondz.de ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Anton Zollondz - Home	Germany de	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bel-ro.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Home	de	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
arelldesign.de ↗	44 match 2 shared topics	Arelldesign - Webdesign und Fotodesign im Raum Uelzen, Lüneburg, Lüchow-Dannenberg - Telefon: 0581 - 20 85 085	Germany de	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dafty.de ↗	40 match 2 shared topics	Dafty	Germany de	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
amzoo.de ↗	39 match 1 shared topics	7werk.de - Webdesign, Drucksachen, Fotografie	Germany de	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mister-anderson.com ↗	38 match 1 shared topics	Mister Anderson Webseiten, Grafikdesign und Printdesign	de	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ascana.de ↗	38 match 1 shared topics	Webdesign Kempten Allgäu \| ascana: Web - Print - Fotografie	Germany de	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
b-c-consulting.ch ↗	37 match 1 shared topics	B C Consulting in Tann, für Print- und Webdesign, Grafikdesign, Lektorat, Korrektorat	Switzerland de	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.