similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to definify.app

Definify alternatives & similar sites

definify – Begriffe, Abkürzungen & Symbole einfach erklärt — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Education →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
cv-kursblog.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	kursblog – Aus dem Unterricht ins Netz	Germany de	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
amerika-akademie.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Die Bayerische Amerika-Akademie – Amerikahaus	Germany de	education TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
extremismus.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Jürgen P. Lang – Wikipedia	de	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
beneficialproject.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Beneficial – "Akwaaba"	de	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
digitale-bildung.ch ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Kritisch-reflexive Medienbildung – Differenz und Tellerrand	Switzerland de	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
2mind.org ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	2mind – Medien für Menschen	de	education WordPress Reaction Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
anthro-publics.de ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	DFG Netzwerk Public Anthropology – Wissenspraktiken und gesellschaftliche Interventionen der ethnologischen Fächer	Germany de	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
demobus.ch ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Demokratiebus – Demokratiebildung macht Schule	Switzerland de	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
demokratiebus.ch ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Demokratiebus – Demokratiebildung macht Schule	Switzerland de	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pambanafoundation.org ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Pambana Foundation e.V.	de	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mimir-mentor.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Literaturrecherche, Korrektur & Plagiatsprüfung \| Mimir Mentor	de	education WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
de.wikipedia.org ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Wikipedia – Die freie Enzyklopädie	de	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
anlahr.de ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Wikipedia – Die freie Enzyklopädie	Germany de	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cschaffranek.de ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Medienpädagogik \| Corinna Schaffranek	Germany de	education Wix	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
curriculare-innovation.de ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Curriculare Innovation – Stand: 18.05.2026	Germany de	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
annekkrueger.de ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Anne K. Krüger \| Sociologist – Sociologist	Germany de	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
digitales-schulbuch.berlin ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Blog zum digitalen Schulbuch – Informationen rund um das digitale Sculbuch	de	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
postcolonialities.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	PostColonialities Lab – a collaborative research space	de	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.