similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to defensivemining.com

Defensivemining alternatives & similar sites

Defensive Mining - Strategic Mining Intelligence — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Information And Network Security →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
cyber-brief.net ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	Cyber-Brief — Strategic Intelligence	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 3
defaudit.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Defensive Audit - Intelligent Security Auditor	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
casperglobalintelligence.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Casper Intelligence	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	partial · 14
siegedna.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Security Intelligence Services - Siege DNA	en	information-and-network-security WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cyber-intelligence.tech ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Cyber Intelligence	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cyberintelligence.tech ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Cyber Intelligence	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aarjavv.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Aarjavv™ \| Intelligence-Driven Anti-Phishing Defense	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
defection.io ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Defection Intelligence \| Welcome	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
andygilor.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Andy Gilor Intelligence Hub	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ancileintel.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Ancile Intelligence Services	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
csintlarp.org ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Sujrb \| OSINT Intelligence Platform	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ctx.io ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	CTX \| Cyber Threat Intelligence Platform	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
prescient.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Prescient - Tech-Enabled Cyber Intelligence	en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
andierebara.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	AE Sys Intelligence & Investigative Analytics	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
breachcase.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	BreachCase - Data Breach Intelligence	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cspd.io ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	CSP Domain Intelligence	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
cybrain.tech ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Nerd@Heart — Cybersecurity Intelligence & Advisory	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
catchprobe.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	CatchProbe Intelligence Technology	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.