similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to ddewald.de

Ddewald alternatives & similar sites

Portfolio – Eine andere WordPress-Site. — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
d3vspace.de ↗	79 match 1 shared topics	{d3v}space – Eine andere WordPress-Site.	Germany de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
andreashoefig.de ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Andreas Höfig – Noch eine weitere, überflüssige WordPress-Site	Germany de	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
minuy.info ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Anmelden ‹ M in UY – WordPress	de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
asgaros.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Asgaros – Support for the Asgaros Forum WordPress Plugin	Germany de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
area85.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	AREA85 – Ein Blog von Kevin Reymann.	Germany de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
p-r.tech ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Press-Release.tech \| Technische Neuheiten auf einem Blick	de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
andreas-trassl.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Homepage – Andreas Traßl	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
avatar-dc.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Avatar – DC	Germany de	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
andreassackl.net ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Dr. Andreas Sackl – Scientist – Technolgy Experience and Acceptance	de	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0dte-solutions.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Home – Support Desk - 0dte-solutions.com	de	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
payou.ch ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Home \| My Website	Switzerland de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
andreabrenner.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Brenner – Wikipedia	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
artikelbude.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	artikelbude.de \| Words	Germany de	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kwintum.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Startseite – Kwintum	de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mebeim.net ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Marco Bonelli – @mebeim	de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
amenthes.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	amenthes.de – Technology, Media and Life in General.	Germany de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
otremba.net ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Alle Seiten – Matts Wiki	de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 2
mcmaier.net ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	mcmaier.net – Martin Maier	Germany~ de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.