similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to dbms-publishing.de

Dbms Publishing alternatives & similar sites

dbms-publishing Stürner — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Databases →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
nfdi4ing.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	NFDI4ING home	Germany de	databases WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
powerofbi.at ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	workingondata \| my personal blog about everything Data Platform related, Microsoft Fabric, Data Governance, Power BI stuff and everything that's interesting	Austria de	databases WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
accessunddatenexpertise-olsberg.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Mentoring für Access & SQL Server Modernisierung \| On-Prem Experte	de	databases	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
minceddata.info ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Mincing Data - Gain insight from data - Mincing Data - Gain Insight from Data	de	databases Jimdo	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
qodax.net ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Startseite - QODAX	de	databases WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
qualiproof.info ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	qualitype Qualiproof – Das Datenbanksystem im Salmonellenmonitoring	de	databases WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
qualiproof.net ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	qualitype Qualiproof – Das Datenbanksystem im Salmonellenmonitoring	de	databases WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
qyte.net ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Qyte: Startseite	de	databases TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
rabbitgarden.software ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	rabbit garden software – just another softwareentwicklungs-(b)log	de	databases WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
melusine.info ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Willkommen! \| Melusine-Online-Archiv (MOA) V1.0 - Demoversion	de	databases Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
23degrees.io ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Create, find and reuse interactive data visualizations - 23°	de	databases	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cultos.org ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	CULTOS - Multimediales Wissensmanagement - Salzburg Research Forschungsgesellschaft	de	databases WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
culturebase.org ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Willkommen im CultureBase Info-HUB - CultureBase	de	databases	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
culturecloud.me ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Kulturserver - CultureBase - Kulturdatenbank	de	databases	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
i40-readiness-check.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	ECLASS Datenstandard für Waren und Dienstleistungen	de	databases	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ichspende.org ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Datenbanken und Anwendungsentwicklung	de	databases	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nubify.me ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	nubibase - Digitale Transformation leicht gemacht	de	databases WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
open-innovation-hannover.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Knowledge Centered Service - pro accessio GmbH	de	databases WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.