similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to davidjonas.net

Davidjonas alternatives & similar sites

David Jonas - Cross-Technology Engineer, Media Artist & Educator — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
iamteri.tech ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Teri Eyenike - Creative Technologist & Educator \| Building future tools	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mikedklein.dev ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Mike Klein - Senior Software Engineer & Technology Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ctn-rtc.org ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Capital Technology Network	Canada~ en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
a1techz.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	- Latest Technology and Education	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
educationaltechs.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Educationaltechs \| Your Education & Technology Hub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
shadetreegeek.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Michael Lyons \| Staff Technology Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
medina.nyc ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Gustavo Medina \| Technology Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
turbogearsbook.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Turbogears Book \| Technology & Social Media News	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
assadontech.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Mathematical Science & Technologies	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
assistivetechconnect.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Assistive Technology Connection	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mieth-engineering.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Mieth Engineering \| Engineering Consultancy	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
shebatechnology.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Sheba Technology	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dominicfallows.uk ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Dominic Fallows / Technical Leader and Software Engineer	United Kingdom en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
8celerate.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Lab8 — Consumer Technology Builder, Operator & Investor	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
shahsanjay.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Sanjay Shah \| Founder, Engineer, CEO at Debuginit	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abby-martinez.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Abby Martinez \| Digital Technology and Culture	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
shaibusamuel.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Samuel Shaibu \| Data Scientist, Data Engineer, and Technical Writer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aaronwagner.io ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Aaron Wagner - Avid technologist, engineer, and big thinker	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.