similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to dasnorm.ch

Dasnorm alternatives & similar sites

Das Norm - Kaspar Flückiger — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Computer Animation →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
sivarkasman.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Homepage - Sivar Kasman	en	computer-animation WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3dealism.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	3dealism.com - Animation & VFX	en	computer-animation	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
vrxanimation.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	VRX Animation – Motion Design Portfolio by Vaidas Ruskys	en	computer-animation	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
doromotion.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	doromotion – Das Stop Motion Animationsstudio von Dorothea Vogel in Berlin	en	computer-animation WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
507movements.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	507 Mechanical Movements	en	computer-animation	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
animade.tv ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Animade - Animation Studio in London	en	computer-animation	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cgmeetup.net ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	CGMeetup Professional Network for Film & Animation, Vfx, Digital Artists	en	computer-animation	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
crystal-skies.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Phweedom Studio	en	computer-animation	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
css-animations.io ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Hello, animation! — Animations — HTML Academy	en	computer-animation	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
howard-klein.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Howard Klein – Musings on software, discrete event simulation and other pseudo-random topics	en	computer-animation WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
howardklein.net ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Howard Klein – Musings on software, discrete event simulation and other pseudo-random topics	en	computer-animation WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
howdy-partner.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Howdy Partner \| Exceptional art, animatics and motion content	en	computer-animation WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
howdypartnerstudio.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Howdy Partner \| Exceptional art, animatics and motion content	en	computer-animation WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hudsonsances.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Digital MediaHudson Sances Hudson Sances Animation Graphic Design	en	computer-animation WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
huntershickle.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Hunter Shickle \| Home	en	computer-animation	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mykechapman.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	mykechapman.com – Myke Chapman – 2D Animator & Composer	en	computer-animation WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mylittlefirmament.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	My Little Firmament – I see!	en	computer-animation WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mysevenframes.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Seven Frames \| Story-Driven Animation for Modern Brands	en	computer-animation	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.