similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to danielwolbert.de

Danielwolbert alternatives & similar sites

Daniel Wolbert – Art Direction & Design — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Design →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
damiansturm.de ↗	76 match 1 shared topics	Damian Sturm – Art Direction & Design	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
annakiefer.de ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Art Direction & Grafik Design	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
daniel-schnatterer.de ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Arbeiten – Daniel Schnatterer – Brand Design – Art Direction	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
design-m.de ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Maria Rank – Mediendesign & Art Direction	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
demusdesign.de ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Demus Design \| Creative Direction & Design	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
design-im-puls.de ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	design im puls – Grafikdesign & Art Direction	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
design-impuls.de ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	design im puls – Grafikdesign & Art Direction	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
anita-popp.de ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	ap* anita carina popp \| art direction & brand design	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
danielbergert.de ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Daniel Bergert \| Art Director	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mischafrank.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Mischa Frank – Art Director, UI/UX Designer	de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
annika-andes.de ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Design & Art Direction \| Annika Andes-Schöler	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
annette-buhl.de ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Annette Buhl – Art Direktion – Graphik Design	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
heymarcello.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Heymarcello – Freelance Art Director & Designer	de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
andrealacher.ch ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Andrea Lacher \| Grafik Design & Art Direction \| Zürich	Switzerland de	design Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
anna-arndt.de ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Anna Arndt Art Direction copy 5	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
corneliawenk.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Art Direction \| Brand Design \| Packaging Design	de	design Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
antonmahringer.de ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Grafik Design & Art Direction \| Anton Mahringer, München \| Home	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
deshalb.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	deshalb. \| Desha Nujsongsinn Art Direction \| Graphic Design	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.