similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to danielstange.de

Danielstange alternatives & similar sites

blog.danielstange.de – Der ganze Gemischtwarenladen… — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
danielkorgel.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Daniel Korgel – Developer – Author – Maker – Enthusiast	Germany de	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
datenleben.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	datenleben – der podcast über data science	Germany de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
daniel-kuhn.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Daniel Kuhn	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
danlooo.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Daniel Loos	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
danielmeint.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Daniel Meint	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
danieleisele.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Daniel Eisele	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dehyped.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	dehyped – Der Podcast über Technik – und darüber, was sie mit uns macht	Germany de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
amenthes.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	amenthes.de – Technology, Media and Life in General.	Germany de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
crewnect.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Agilexity – Beweg dich mit der Zeit	Germany de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
danielson.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Daniel Notthoff	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
daniels-notes.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Daniel’s notes	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
area85.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	AREA85 – Ein Blog von Kevin Reymann.	Germany de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
danymu.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	danymu.de - Homepage of Daniel Bergmann	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dariks.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Daniel Rippen \| Ein kleiner Administrator Blog	Germany de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kwintum.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Startseite – Kwintum	de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
daniel-woste.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Daniel Woste personal page — danwos documentation	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
coreline.ch ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Coreline – Das Tech-Netzwerk für High-Tech Elektronik & digitale Tools	Switzerland de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcmaier.net ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	mcmaier.net – Martin Maier	Germany~ de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.