similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to danielbretz.de

Danielbretz alternatives & similar sites

Daniel Bretz – Creative Director & Illustrator — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Design →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
herrmellin.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	herrmellin.com – Creative Director	de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
danieltomcic.de ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Daniel Tomcic - Art & Creative Director aus München	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
danielheller.de ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Daniel Heller / Freelance Creative & Art Director / München	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
danielschlereth.de ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Daniel Schlereth · Creative Project Manager & Art Director · Berlin	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
artistiko.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Alessandro Casciana Independent Creative Director	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
design-merkel.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Home – Designagentur Merkel - Creative Director & Designer aus Kempten (Allgäu)	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
hubri.ch ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	portfolio - flo hubrich \| freelance creative director	Switzerland de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
danielbergert.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Daniel Bergert \| Art Director	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
demusdesign.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Demus Design \| Creative Direction & Design	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
daverindorindo.de ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Dave Rindo Rindo — Art Director · Visual Designer · Illustrator	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
estrelacadente.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Estrela Cadente – creative team	de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agentsy.ch ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Agentsy – Grafik & Illustration	Switzerland de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
fuelformars.co ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	FUEL FOR MARS ® – creative studio	Colombia de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
creativepuzzle.de ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	CreativePuzzle – Creative Solutions	Germany de	design WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
atelierkaymak.de ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Grafikdesigner & Illustrator Aachen \| Kaymak – Konzept, Animation, Apps	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
danielbartel.de ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Design Director in Berlin – Daniel Bartel \| Product & Brand	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
architekturillustrationen-gall.de ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Eike R. Gall, Illustrator	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cs-design-bochum.de ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	CS Creative Design – Alles aus dem Pott	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.