similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to danielbartel.de

Danielbartel alternatives & similar sites

Design Director in Berlin – Daniel Bartel | Product & Brand — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Design →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
daniel-schnatterer.de ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Arbeiten – Daniel Schnatterer – Brand Design – Art Direction	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
danielorlowski.de ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Daniel Orlowski - Product Designer & Builder	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
danielschlereth.de ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Daniel Schlereth · Creative Project Manager & Art Director · Berlin	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
davidbrandau.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	davidbrandau.com – David Brandau – Digital Product Design – Berlin and Amsterdam	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
darionass.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Dario Naß - Digital Product Designer	Germany de	design Webflow	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mrpander.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Felix Sander – Creative Director aus Berlin	United States~ de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
armanemami.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Emamidesign - Produktdesign in Berlin / Industrial Design	Germany de	design TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
annaquentin.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Anna Quentin – Product design	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
anki-design.de ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Anki Art+Design Berlin	Germany de	design Shopify	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
danielbergert.de ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Daniel Bergert \| Art Director	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
corneliawenk.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Art Direction \| Brand Design \| Packaging Design	de	design Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dette-design.de ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Dette Design – Markenarchitektur \| Produkt	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
designloungemunich.de ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Ihre Grafik & Brandingagentur – designlounge	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
danielwolbert.de ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Daniel Wolbert – Art Direction & Design	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
danielbretz.de ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Daniel Bretz – Creative Director & Illustrator	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
danieladehn.de ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Daniela Dehn \| Art Director aus München \| Grafikdesign	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
daniela-neuhaeuser.de ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	KOMMUNIKATIONSDESIGN – daniela-neuhaeuser.de	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
laschprillwitz.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Produktdesign Lasch+Prillwitz Design aus Berlin	de	design WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	email phone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.