similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to daniel-schnatterer.de

Daniel Schnatterer alternatives & similar sites

Arbeiten – Daniel Schnatterer – Brand Design – Art Direction — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Design →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
ninawilsmann.de ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Nina Simone Wilsmann – Art Direction · Corporate Design · Illustration	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
buerobecker.ch ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Büro Becker – Identity \| Brand Design \| Art Direction	Switzerland de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
opki.de ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Orson Podgorski – Art Direction & Experience Design	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
andreaskonrad.ch ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	andreas konrad \| Art Direction und Multimedia-Design	Switzerland de	design Squarespace Magento	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
studio-marlene.at ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	brand_new \| GRAFIK DESIGN STUDIO marlene	Austria de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rauss.net ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Hannah Rauß – Portfolio – Visual Communcation Designer – Hamburg	de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
designteam.eu ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	designteam – visual solutions	European Union de	design WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ap-media.at ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Alexandra Maria Warlits – Art Director	Austria de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nordquisit.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Brand Design in Nürnberg \| Content and Brand Craft	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
niostudio.at ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	NIO design studio – Branding & Grafikdesign	Austria de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nicolashoefer.de ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Nicolas Höfer Art Direction Freelance Concept	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
andrealacher.ch ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Andrea Lacher \| Grafik Design & Art Direction \| Zürich	Switzerland de	design Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nikolamartini.de ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Nikola Martini – Design & Creative Direction	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nextcom-art.de ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	nextcom ART \| Kreatives Arbeiten und individuelle Design-Lösungen	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
angelo-rizzuto.ch ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Home - art of metal design – ANGELO RIZZUTO	Switzerland de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
artofmetaldesign.ch ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Home - art of metal design – ANGELO RIZZUTO	Switzerland de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nicolai-rissmann.de ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Nicolai Rissmann - Art Director	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
katjakniel.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	KKDesign – Katja Kniel – Grafik- und Kommunikationsdesign	de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.