similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to daniel-esch.de

Daniel Esch alternatives & similar sites

Daniel Esch — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Biological Sciences →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
nmette.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Nikolai Mette, Dr. rer. nat. - -	Germany de	biological-sciences	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
biologiedidaktik.at ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Biologiedidaktik	Austria de	biological-sciences WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
biologik.at ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Kundenbereich Stephanie Wohlfahrt	Austria de	biological-sciences Spree Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
neumann-held.de ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Eva M. Neumann-Held - Webpräsenz	Germany de	biological-sciences	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
piastettler.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Pia Stettler — Datenanalyse, Modellierung & Forschungsdesign	Switzerland~ de	biological-sciences	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nils-ehrenberg.de ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Nils Ehrenberg - Meeresbiologe, Journalist & Autor	Germany de	biological-sciences WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	full · 11
mikrokokua.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Mikrokokua Mikrobiologisches Know-How - STARTSEITE	de	biological-sciences WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
keenmolecules.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Keen Molecules Bioservices – Biologie, DNA-Analysen & Gewässerökologie	de	biological-sciences WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ekintilic.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Scientist \| Ekin Tilic	de	biological-sciences Wix	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
iceage-project.org ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	IceAGE - iceage-projects Webseite!	de	biological-sciences Jimdo	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
biotechstudieren.at ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Biotech Campus Tulln \| FHWN	Austria de	biological-sciences	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
allergosan.ch ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Institut AllergoSan - Centre de compétence en recherche microbiomique	Switzerland de	biological-sciences WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bioinf.at ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Institute of Bioinformatics - Our mission is to conduct internationally renowned research	Austria de	biological-sciences	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
meerkatafrica.org ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Kalahari Research Centre	de	biological-sciences	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
deleatur.net ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Dr. Christa Söhllektorat DE \| lektorat, DE \| , DE	de	biological-sciences WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ibbs19.org ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	IBBS19	de	biological-sciences	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
oesmann.net ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	NetWork – Büro für Fisch- und Gewässerbiologie	de	biological-sciences WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
netcomi.de ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Network Construction and Comparison for Microbiome Data • NetCoMi	Germany de	biological-sciences	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.