similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to daef-onboarding.de

Daef Onboarding alternatives & similar sites

Anmelden ‹ DÄF Onboarding – WordPress — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
cookielay.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Cookielay – WordPress-Plugin \| WordPress.org Deutsch	de	web-development WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
danielilin.de ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Daniel Ilin – Portfolio	Germany de	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dejavucorporation.de ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	DejaVu Corporation – Trawling the interwebs	Germany de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
360codelab.io ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	360codeLab – Bringing ideas full circle	de	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
coffeeandcode.ch ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	coffeeandcode – crafting code cup by cup	Switzerland de	web-development WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
voltdeco.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	VOLTDECO – Guerilla Code	de	web-development WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
prebuds.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	PreBuds – Wissen ist Rohstoff – Er vermehrt sich bei Gebrauch	de	web-development WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
altersfreigaben.de ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Philipp Wensauer – Software Developer	Germany de	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nestcode.ch ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	NestCode – Digitale Lösungen & Beratung	Switzerland de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
didaktica.de ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Testseite – eine Seite auf der ich Plugins teste	Germany de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dirschedl.de ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Fritz's Tech – Fritz's web technology playground	Germany de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aniess.de ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	ANiess Dev. – ANiess Dev. open source hardware	Germany de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
astradev.de ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	astradev – The right service provider for you.	Germany de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
digitale-zukunft.tech ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Digitale Zukunft – Blog zur digitalen Souveränität	de	web-development WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
si-technics.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Methods and Indie Think Tank – Independent R&D – Designed by SI in Baden-Württemberg ;-)	de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cookieinfo.org ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Cookie Info	de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
crewman.de ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	textorius.net - Index	Germany de	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
creation-center.de ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Creation Center	Germany de	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.