similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to daccuss.de

Daccuss alternatives & similar sites

Research for Sustainability (FONA) – FONA — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Environment →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
eudr-info.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	EUDR Info - Compliance & Sustainability	de	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
crslr.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	CRSLR Research Group	Germany de	environment	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
forst-or.ch ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Aktuell – Forst AG Oberes Rheintal	Switzerland de	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
consystain.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	CONSYSTAIN – Mit Menschen nachhaltig	de	environment WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dauerwaelder.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Hanse Forst – Waldwirtschaft natürlich nachhaltig	Germany de	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
all-4-future.net ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	allforfuture – Münchener Klimaheld*innen For Future	de	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
allff.net ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	allforfuture – Münchener Klimaheld*innen For Future	de	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
amber-forschung.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	AMBER – Aktive Mobilität zur Förderung von Gesundheit und Umweltschutz	Germany de	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
blue-community.ch ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Blue Community – Gemeinsam engagiert für unser Wasser	Switzerland de	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bluecommunity.ch ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Blue Community – Gemeinsam engagiert für unser Wasser	Switzerland de	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
crystalveil-mountain.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	CrystalVeil Mountain Eco – Gemeinsam für eine saubere Zukunft	de	environment	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cycle-of-life.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Cycle of Life – https://www.cycle-of-life.de	Germany de	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
digitizetheplanet.org ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Digitize the Planet – Wir machen Naturschutz digital.	de	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
ampeco.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Strahlmittel – natürlich, nachhaltig, ampeco	Germany de	environment WordPress WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alymp.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Alymp – Mutterboden	Germany de	environment WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0foundry.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Zukunft der Meere – Geo-Projekt	de	environment	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
allefuersklima.org ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Alle fürs Klima e.V. – –	de	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hiksch.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Uwe Hiksch bloggt \| Informationen und Infos über Anti-Atom, Antimilitarismus und NaturFreunde.	de	environment Adobe Experience Manager	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.