similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to culturaltransfer.com

Culturaltransfer alternatives & similar sites

Roland O. Westermaier – Typografie | Gebrauchsgrafik — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Design →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
culturaltransfer.net ↗	85 match 1 shared topics	Roland O. Westermaier – Typografie \| Gebrauchsgrafik	de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
culturaltransfer.org ↗	85 match 1 shared topics	Roland O. Westermaier – Typografie \| Gebrauchsgrafik	de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
katharinahengster.de ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Katharina Hengster – Brand Designer & Typografie	Germany de	design Webflow	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gygaxprepress.ch ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Gygax Prepress – Typografie und Design für die visuelle Kommunikation	Switzerland de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joergendreher.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	MONOGRAFIE \| joergendreher	Germany de	design Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
afg-gaisberg.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Atelier für Grafik – Grafik-Design Büro	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
neifer-design.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	designeifer Grafik Design & Fotografie Essen	de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joanakatte.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Joana Katte • Buchgestaltung Design Typografie Konzeption	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hr-mayr.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	hr. mayr – grafik & design	de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kenny-huebner.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Kenny Hübner – Grafik-Designer aus Leipzig	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jb-grafikdesign.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Juliane Buser – Grafikdesign – Buchcover und Werbemittel	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
julieheumueller.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Julie Heumüller – [:en]Graphic designer with focus on typography and information design \| Berlin[:]	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
juliaastrup.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Julia Astrup – Grafik und Design	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
julia-astrup.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Julia Astrup – Grafik und Design	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
formzone.ch ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	FORMZONE Christian Speck - Architektur - Fotografie - Grafik	Switzerland de	design Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jana-mersch.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	jana mersch . grafik-designerin \| graphic designer . illustrator . typographer	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
katjabackesneuninger.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	katja backes-neuninger – Dipl. Grafik-Designerin	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
grafikexpress.ch ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Home \| Grafik Express	Switzerland de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.