similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to creation-facts.org

Creation Facts alternatives & similar sites

Creation Facts - Confronting The Lies Of Evolution — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Science →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
human-evolution.net ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Human Evolution	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
tswrevolution.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	The Science Writing Revolution	en	science Sanity	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
idthefuture.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	ID the Future \| Intelligent Design, Evolution, and Science Podcast	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
diamonds-are-forever.org.uk ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	30 Facts About Diamonds - Facts.now	United Kingdom en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nuclear-shields.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Nuclear Shields - Radiation Shielding Solutions & Equipment	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
oeci.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	NOAA Ocean Exploration Cooperative Institute – Exploring the Nation's Blue Frontier	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ctmu.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	TELEOLOGIC EVOLUTION	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
reflective.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Reflective \| Radically Accelerating the Pace of Sunlight Reflection Research	en	science Sanity	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
52-insights.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	52 Insights - Intelligence. Inspiration. Conversations. Exploring the divide between popular culture and science.	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
humanevolution2-22-2222.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	The Road to Human Evolution 2-22-2222	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
iapress.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Statistics, Optimization & Information Computing	en	science Reaction Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
creations-project.eu ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Home Creations - CREATIONS Project	European Union en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
designomics.co.uk ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Unmasking an Illusion - Evolution vs Empirical Science	United Kingdom en	science Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
100rss.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Shocking facts, discoveries, inventions • Sensation!	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rationallythinkingoutloud.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Evolution & Darwinism \| Rationally Thinking Out Loud	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
humanitystats.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Humanity Stats — Track humanity’s evolution in real time	en	science	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
impressivefacts.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Interesting Facts Hardly Anyone Knows \| Impressive Facts	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cas.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Empowering Innovation & Scientific Discoveries \| CAS	United States~ en	science	robots llmsaihumans	email phone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.