similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to cosfar.fr

Cosfar alternatives & similar sites

COS – Fontenay-aux-Roses – Comité des oeuvres sociales — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Civic Affairs →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
copili.be ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	COPILI – Comité de Pilotage du Secteur de l'Intégration	Belgium fr	civic-affairs WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ccvq.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	CCVQ : Comité des citoyens du Vieux-Québec	fr	civic-affairs	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
maires40.fr ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Association des Maires et Présidents de communauté des Landes – AML 40	France fr	civic-affairs TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
magonty.fr ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Comité de Quartier Magonty – Association loi 1901 – n° 4097 du 20 novembre 1945	France fr	civic-affairs WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ithea-conseil.fr ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Ithéa - Experts des politiques sociales locales	France fr	civic-affairs WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mairiesevelinges.fr ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Mairie Sevelinges – Commune de Sevelinges – Loire	France fr	civic-affairs WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jumelageleconquet.fr ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Comité de Jumelage Le Conquet – Llandeilo	France fr	civic-affairs WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csmazeres.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Cap' de Tout – centre social	fr	civic-affairs WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lansac-ravel.fr ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Accueil - Comité de jumelage Lansac-Ravel	France fr	civic-affairs Jimdo	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
malbosc-bouge.fr ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Malbosc Bouge – Site WEB du comité de quartier - à Montpellier	France fr	civic-affairs WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
faubourgwalburgis.be ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Comité de Quartier Sainte-Walburge (CQSW) – Comité de Quartier Sainte-Walburge (CQSW)	Belgium fr	civic-affairs WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alpesmiel.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Alpesmiel - L'actualité des Alpes sous tous ses angles	fr	civic-affairs	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cslouisriel.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Accueil - Comité de surveillance Louis-Riel	fr	civic-affairs	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
megasocial.ch ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	MEGA Social Innovation – Conseil en innovation sociale	Switzerland fr	civic-affairs WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
fragnee.be ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Accueil \| Comité de Quartier Fragnée-Blonden	Belgium fr	civic-affairs Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jumelagecharenton.fr ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Comité de jumelage Charenton-le-pont	France fr	civic-affairs WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mairie-chatres.fr ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Mairie de Châtres – Aube – 10510	France fr	civic-affairs WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bissib.be ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	BISSIB – Bruxelles innovation sociale	Belgium fr	civic-affairs WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 12

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.