similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to conjoncture-analyse.com

Conjoncture Analyse alternatives & similar sites

Nos Analyses | Galerie de Travaux Conjoncture Analyse — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Economy →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
conjoncture-eco.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Conditions d'Utilisation – Conjoncture Éco	en	economy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cebr.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Leading economic forecasts and analysis \| Cebr	en	economy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
dhtayloranalysis.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	D. H. Taylor Analysis \| Substack	en	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
2teconomics.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	2t Economics: Daily Economic Analysis - Finance \| 2T Economics	en	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
laroberts.net ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Lester Roberts — Economist, Data Analyst & Artist	en	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alignmenteconomy.org ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	The Alignment Economy \| A New Way to Measure and Transfer Value	en	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ddestrategies.org ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	DDES - Data-Driven Economic Strategies \| Colorado Springs Economic Research	United States~ en	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcneesedrewecon.org ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	McNeese Drew Econ – H.C. Drew Center for Business and Economic Analysis	United States~ en	economy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cn-itie.ci ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	CN-ITIE	en	economy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
consilia.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	CONSILIA Group - Research and Analysis - Economy, Finance, Information, Defence and Politics	en	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
consiliagroup.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	CONSILIA Group - Research and Analysis - Economy, Finance, Information, Defence and Politics	en	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
consiliagroupassociates.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	CONSILIA Group - Research and Analysis - Economy, Finance, Information, Defence and Politics	en	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
consiliastrategy.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	CONSILIA Group - Research and Analysis - Economy, Finance, Information, Defence and Politics	en	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
2morrownomics.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	2morrownomics – Futurology, politics and economics	en	economy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
elisabethtester.ch ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Elisabeth Tester - From facts to stories \| Economic writer	Switzerland en	economy Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ahiggins.co.uk ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Ayden Higgins \| Senior Lecturer, University of Exeter	United Kingdom en	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
civiceconomics.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Home	en	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
laffercenter.org ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	The Laffer Center for Supply-Side Economics \| Laffer Curve	en	economy WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.