similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to compadre-db.com

Compadre Db alternatives & similar sites

: COMPADRE - Plant Matrix Database — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Biological Sciences →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
critterbase.de ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	CRITTERBASE	Germany de	biological-sciences	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jonasplatzek.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Jonas Platzek	de	biological-sciences	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
blackice.blog ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	BLACK.ICE – GLAZIALES MIKROBIELLES LEBEN ALS BESCHLEUNIGER DER GLETSCHERSCHMELZE DURCH BIOALBEDO	de	biological-sciences WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
radiaesthesie-geobiologie.at ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Radiaesthesie-Geobiologie \| Startseite	Austria de	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
science-art.at ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	science + art – MMag. Alice Schmatzberger	Austria de	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csoennichsen.de ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Prof. Dr. Carsten Sönnichsen \| FB 09 - Nanobiotechnology	Germany de	biological-sciences WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csbdresden.de ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Center for Systems Biology Dresden: Center for Systems Biology Dresden	Germany de	biological-sciences TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
daas-doktorandenseminar.de ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Karst Group - DAAS - Doktorandenseminar	Germany de	biological-sciences	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
labinadrop.org ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	LAB in a DROP - Experimente im Wassertropfen	de	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nicoleamberg.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Nicole Amberg	de	science Joomla	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rolandertl.at ↗	40 match 2 shared topics	Roland Ertl - • 1 der Anfang	Austria de	biological-sciences	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dafp.de ↗	40 match 2 shared topics	Deutsche Akademie für Photobiologie und Phototechnologie (DAfP) \| Gesellschaft für technische und medizinische Anwendungen optischer Strahlung	Germany de	biological-sciences WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4d-biostem.org ↗	40 match 2 shared topics	Home \| 4D-BioSTEM	de	biological-sciences TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
h-saur.com ↗	40 match 2 shared topics	H S Laborbedarf Reutlingen \| Gel Instrumente AG \| Hansatech %	de	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pccl.at ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	PCCL: Polymer Competence Center Leoben	Austria de	science TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csachse.de ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	Christian Sachse - Philosophy of Biology	Germany de	biological-sciences	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cs-communication.org ↗	31 match 1 shared topics	Startseite - CS Science Communication GmbH	de	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jonathan-daume.net ↗	31 match 1 shared topics	about me - Jonathan Daume	de	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.