similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔎Similar Site SearchFind websites like any domain 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Toplists Browse free →

Sites similar to chroe.dk

Chroe alternatives & similar sites

Christiansø Naturvidenskabelige Feltstation — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Environment →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
mst.dk ↗	28 match shared topic	Erhverv - Miljøstyrelsen	Denmark da	environment	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dn.dk ↗	28 match shared topic	Danmarks Naturfredningsforening \| Danmarks Naturfredningsforening	Denmark da	environment	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mim.dk ↗	28 match shared topic	Miljøministeriet - Miljøministeriet	Denmark da	environment	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dof.dk ↗	28 match shared topic	Forside - DOF BirdLife	Denmark da	nature Joomla	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
kyst.dk ↗	28 match shared topic	Kystdirektoratet - Kystdirektoratet	Denmark da	environment	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
okologi.dk ↗	28 match shared topic	Økologisk Landsforening	Denmark da	environment Umbraco	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
naturstyrelsen.dk ↗	18 match shared topic	Naturstyrelsen - Naturstyrelsen	Denmark da	parks-and-nature	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
wwf.dk ↗	18 match shared topic	WWF Danmark \| Verdens største uafhængige naturorganisation	Denmark da	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
redorangutangen.dk ↗	18 match shared topic	Red Orangutangen – Hjælp Orangutangerne og Bevar Regnskoven	Denmark da	environment WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nwf.org ↗	55 match shared topic	National Wildlife Federation	United States~ en	environment	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
butterfly-conservation.org ↗	55 match shared topic	Home page \| Butterfly Conservation	en	environment Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
artportalen.se ↗	55 match shared topic	Välkommen till Artportalen	Sweden sv	nature	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cnps.org ↗	55 match shared topic	California Native Plant Society	en	environment WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bluehende-landschaft.de ↗	55 match shared topic	Netzwerk Blühende Landschaft - aktiv gegen das Artensterben tätig werden	Germany de	environment WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
stiftung-naturschutz.de ↗	55 match shared topic	Stiftung Naturschutz Berlin	Germany de	nature TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gwct.org.uk ↗	55 match shared topic	Game & Wildlife Conservation Trust - The GWCT	United Kingdom en	environment	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
infoflora.ch ↗	55 match shared topic	Home	Switzerland de	nature	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
wildgehege-verband.de ↗	55 match shared topic	Deutscher-Wildgehege-Verband e.V. > Home	Germany de	environment	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.