similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to chepeleff.dev

Chepeleff alternatives & similar sites

Tim Chepeleff - Engineering Leader — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
7pm.dev ↗	78 match 1 shared topics	7pm.dev \| Engineering Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ddumont.dev ↗	76 match 1 shared topics	Dan Dumont \| Engineering leader	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
declanflynn.dev ↗	76 match 1 shared topics	Declan Flynn — Engineering Leader	en	technology-and-computing WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
brianorr.com ↗	76 match 1 shared topics	Brian Orr - Engineering leader and musician	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aarkatta.com ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	Ramesh Katta \| Software Engineering Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
cat-herding.net ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	Ian Lintner - Engineering Leader & Platform Architect	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ibraheem-abukaff.com ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Ibraheem Abu Kaff — Software Engineering Leader \| Dubai	en	technology-and-computing	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
carsonhinckley.com ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Carson Hinckley - Full-stack Engineer & Engineering Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
brukslogic.com ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Bruk Belachew — Engineering leader, writer, builder	United States~ en	technology-and-computing	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
zugzwa.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Zugzwa \| Engineering the Future	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
lawrencemardon.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Lawrence Mardon \| Engineering Leader & Systems Architect \| Lawrence Mardon	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
betz-engineering.ch ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Betz Engineering	Switzerland en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gavinwoods.co.uk ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Gavin Woods - Engineer, manager, leader	United Kingdom en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
iamhasnat.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Home - Abul Hasnat \| Software Engineering Team Lead	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
chaosengineeringstories.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Chaos Engineering Stories	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dekkov.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Hoang Tran - Software Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jonsimpson.ca ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Jon Simpson - Engineering Modern Systems	Canada en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aaravseksaria.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Aarav Seksaria \| Engineering	en	technology-and-computing Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.