Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI Report

Sites similar to chatplaces.org

Chatplaces alternatives & similar sites

ChatPlaces — 10 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Artificial Intelligence →

DomainMatchTitleCountry/LangCategoryAI filesContactAI-protection
vitki.ai 62 match
1 shared topics
Vitki — AI-rådgivning, kurs og opplæring Norway~ no artificial-intelligence robotsllmsaihumans emailphone full · 15
alume.tech 60 match
1 shared topics
Alume no artificial-intelligence robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
1hweek.com 60 match
1 shared topics
1 TIMES UKE | AI Survival Guide no artificial-intelligence robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
kvassai.com 60 match
1 shared topics
KVASS.AI — Skarp nok til å nå toppen | AI-agent for norsk næringsliv no artificial-intelligence robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
skarpki.com 60 match
1 shared topics
Skarp KI no artificial-intelligence robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
evenlhovda.com 30 match
1 shared topics
Even L. Hovda no artificial-intelligence robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
lavamilk.org 30 match
1 shared topics
Lavamilk AS - AI-drevet programvare for helsesektoren no artificial-intelligence robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
bayesmed.ai 30 match
1 shared topics
BayesMed | BayesMed | Home no artificial-intelligence robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
bayesmed.com 30 match
1 shared topics
BayesMed | BayesMed | Home no artificial-intelligence robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
heysmile.ai 30 match
1 shared topics
Portrettbilder med KI - Få levert innen 2 Timer no photo-editing-software robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.