similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to charlezkwan.com

Charlezkwan alternatives & similar sites

Charlez Kwan — Independent system architect and developer. — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
bayethetechnologies.com ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	Bayethe Technologies \| Software and Hardware development Company	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
comvi.io ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	Comvi — translation management system for developers	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
eswarsethu.dev ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Eswar Sivan Sethu — Systems Software Developer	en	technology-and-computing Spree Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
hexa1.io ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Hexa1 \| System Architecture Done Right	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hexa1.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Hexa1 \| System Architecture Done Right	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
oyed.dev ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	software engineer & systems architect \| devlsh	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
devnullkit.org ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	DevNullKit — Developer Utilities & References	en	software-and-applications WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ethan-ray.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Ethan Ray — Software Developer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
conradmuan.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Conrad Aidan Muan - Software developer and Human Being	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alex-white.uk ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Software Developer and Systems Engineer	United Kingdom en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcu-32.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Micro Design Labs LLC – Embedded Hardware and Software Design	en	software-and-applications WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
consensas.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Consensas — Bits & Atoms	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ethanbudreau.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Ethan Budreau - Software Developer	United States~ en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcdonaldconor.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Conor McDonald \| Software Engineer, Systems Builder, MVP Developer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
druss.co ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Ivan Derevianko - Software Developer, Architect, Consultant	Colombia en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
shushereba.dev ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Patrick Shushereba - Software Developer, founder, and amateur runner	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mdmarchitect.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	MDM Architect	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
concurrentdev.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Concurrent Dev - A developer on your team	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.