similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to changhsinlee.com

Changhsinlee alternatives & similar sites

Chang Hsin Lee – Committing my thoughts to words. — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Programming Languages →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
sillycodeproject.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Silly Code Projects - a place to put the code thoughts	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bruceeckel.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Computing Thoughts	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bramcohen.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Bram’s Thoughts \| Substack	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
2bits.tech ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	2Bits - Thoughts & Code	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
brewneaux.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	My posts and thoughts - Brewneaux	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
firstclassthoughts.co.uk ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	First Class Thoughts – Development Developments	United Kingdom en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
24daysindecember.net ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	24 Days in December – Thoughts of the PHPamily	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aalekseev.me ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Robotehnik Thoughts	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
darvillracing.co.uk ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Bunkers \| Journalling my year of making	United Kingdom en	programming-languages WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
fanaticles.co.uk ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Bunkers \| Journalling my year of making	United Kingdom en	programming-languages WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
casperlehmann.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	thoughts.sort()	en	technology-and-computing Gatsby	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
progmot.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Thoughts About Programming & Motivation	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mysticmind.dev ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	MysticMind.dev \| Thoughts on software architecture, .NET, open source, and building things that last. By Babu Annamalai.	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
programmerthoughts.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	programmer thoughts : programmerthoughts.com	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abhilashps.me ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Abhilash PS — Engineering Thought & Software Architecture	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mytechramblings.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	my tech ramblings — A blog for writing about my techie ramblings	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
icanvardar.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Can Vardar	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
programmingbrain.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Programming Brain	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.