similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to cfchildren.org

Cfchildren alternatives & similar sites

Priorities | Evidence-Based Programs | Committee for Children — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Education →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
cfchildren.net ↗	100 match 1 shared topics	Priorities \| Evidence-Based Programs \| Committee for Children	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
95percentgroup.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Evidence-Based Literacy Solutions \| 95 Percent Group	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
profemagnan.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Profe Magnan \| Science of Learning & Evidence-Based Teaching	en	education Ghost	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
iesshanghai.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Study Abroad Programs & Internships \| IES Abroad	en	education Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
iesinternships.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Study Abroad Programs & Internships \| IES Abroad	en	education Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
iesbarcelona.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Study Abroad Programs & Internships \| IES Abroad	en	education Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
iesalumni.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Study Abroad Programs & Internships \| IES Abroad	en	education Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
iesabroad.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Study Abroad Programs & Internships \| IES Abroad	en	education Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ies-studyabroad.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Study Abroad Programs & Internships \| IES Abroad	en	education Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
advocatesforchildren.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Homepage - Advocates for Children of New York	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
allalliedhealthschools.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Find Health Schools and Programs \| All Allied Health Schools	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ebtn.org.uk ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Home page • Evidence Based Teachers Network	United Kingdom en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ccgsvancouver.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	CCGS Vancouver \| Citizens' Committee for Good Schools	United States~ en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
closeup.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Washington DC Student Programs & Resources \| Close Up Foundation	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kars4kidstuition.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Kars For Kids Programs \| Student Grant Program	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
learnwithsoar.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Empower SEL in Schools with SOAR Programs \| Deya	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mediavoicesforchildren.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Media Voices for ChildrenMedia Voices for Children	United States~ en	education Squarespace Squarespace Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
bestdelegate.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Best Delegate \| Model UN Programs, Summer Camps, Tutoring & Resources for Students	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.