similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to cerax.org

Cerax alternatives & similar sites

The Royal European Policy Organisation — CERAX — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Political Issues And Policy →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
policylabmv.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Public Policy Lab — Maldives	en	political-issues-and-policy	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
policy-podium.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	The Policy Podium \| Youth Policy Debate Forum	en	politics Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
policyonthemove.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Policy On The Move – Strategic Insights into Migration, Economic Trends, and Policy in the Americas	en	politics WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cips-indonesia.org ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Home \| Center for Indonesian Policy Studies \| Think Tank	en	political-issues-and-policy Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
policyandculture.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Policy & Culture	en	political-issues-and-policy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bernsecuritydialogue.ch ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Bern Security Dialogue \| Advancing European Security	Switzerland en	politics	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
oxfordchinapolicylab.org ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Oxford China Policy Lab	en	politics	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pacelab.org ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Policy and Cultural Evolution Lab - PACE Lab	en	political-issues-and-policy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
chrisblattman.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Chris Blattman – International development, economics, politics, and policy	en	politics WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
policyactionnetwork.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Policy Action Network \| Nigeria's Policy Action Network	en	politics	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mecep-action.org ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	MECEP Action - The official political and advocacy arm of the Maine Center for Economic Policy	en	politics WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ceegendernetwork.eu ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	CEE Gender Network - The Central and Eastern European Network for Gender Issues	European Union en	political-issues-and-policy Joomla	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
montanapolicyaction.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	- Montana Policy Action	en	politics WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
palestinepolicy.org ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	PCPP - Palestine Center for Public Policy	United States~ en	politics	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
policyprompt.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Policy Prompt: Data-driven Policy Analyis	en	politics	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
policycn.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	China Policy \| home page	en	politics	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
policy-solution.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Policy Solutions Essydo Politics \| Essydo Politics	en	politics WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
politicsballa.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Birth of EU - European Economic Community Countries	en	political-issues-and-policy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.