similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to cejeme.org

Cejeme alternatives & similar sites

Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Economy →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
regionaleconmodelling.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Maine Regional Economic Modeling Lab	en	economy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bjpe.org.br ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Brazilian Journal of Political Economy	Brazil en	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
centrodeeconomiapolitica.org.br ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Brazilian Journal of Political Economy	Brazil en	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abbring.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Jaap H. Abbring \| Professor of Econometrics at Tilburg U Managing Editor of The Econometrics Journal Fellow of CEPR, IAAE, and Econometric Society	en	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ijeci.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Call for Papers — IJECI \| International Journal of Economics and Contemporary Issues	Nigeria~ en	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
iaeb-international.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF ECONOMIC AND BUSINESS	en	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
refpress.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Review of Economics and Finance \| REF	en	economy WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rhetm.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Review of the History of Economic Thought and Methodology	en	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
case-research.eu ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	CASE – Center for Social and Economic Research	European Union en	economy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cbedc.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Central Brooklyn Economic Development Corporation	en	economy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
chasefoster.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Chase Foster \| Political Economist \| European Union politics	en	economy Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
model-aesthetics.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Model Aesthetics – Between Literary and Economic Knowledge	en	economy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ierod.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	institute of economic research and organizational development	en	economy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mikenoel.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Noel Economics \| Competition and Antitrust Economist	en	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcneesedrewecon.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	McNeese Drew Econ – H.C. Drew Center for Business and Economic Analysis	United States~ en	economy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
iegindia.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	IEG – Institute of Economic Growth	en	economy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
carringtonccedc.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	CCEDC – Chamber of Commerce and Economic Development	en	economy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
regionaleconomicresilience.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Regional Economic Resilience	en	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.